Are you looking for the Kodak Luma 150 vs 350 comparison? If yes, you’ve landed on the right page.
Kodak Luma 150 and 350 are popular pocket projectors. Their battery-powered design makes it easy to carry anywhere with you. Both have similar feature sets with a slight price difference.
Hence, in this Kodak Luma 150 vs 350 comparison, I’ll tell you which one you should choose, or if better options are available for the same price.
Kodak Luma 150 vs 350: Which One Should You Buy?
Clearly, the Kodak Luma 350 is a clear winner out of the two. The Kodak Luma 350 has higher brightness, better contrast ratio, Wi-Fi & Bluetooth, Android TV built-in, and retains the same pocketable size as the Kodak Luma 150.
It doesn’t mean the Kodak Luma 150 is completely trash. It has its benefits, including 1080p support and wireless screen mirroring.
Let’s explore the detailed comparison of both projectors, and you be the judge.
First Impression & Design
In the design department, both projectors look eerily similar. You can easily confuse one for the other.
Both projectors have a projection lens at the front, a focus wheel on the left-hand side and wired connectivity ports at the back.
The Kodak Luma 150 has a built-in speaker next to the projector lens, whereas the Kodak Luma 350’s built-in speaker is on the left side, next to the volume wheel.
Both projectors’ top has touch-based controls and a 1/4-inch thread at the bottom for tripod mounting.
Dimensions & Weight
Both projectors are lightweight and have a pocket-able size. Hence, no matter which one you buy, you can easily fit it in your pocket or backpack.
- Kodak Luma 150 dimensions: 3.9-inch width, 3.9-inch length, and 0.78-inch height
- Kodak Luma 350 dimensions: 4.3-inch width, 4.3-inch length, and 1.18-inch height
Talking about weight, the Kodak Luma 150 weighs 0.5 pounds, whereas the Kodak Luma 350 is slightly heavier at 0.75 pounds.
Brightness & Contrast Ratio
The biggest differentiator between the Kodak Luma 150 and 350 are their brightness and contrast ratio.
Out of the two, the Kodak Luma 350 has a higher brightness at 150 lumens. On the other hand, the Kodak Luma 150 has a brightness of around 60 ANSI lumens, which doesn’t justify its price.
Similarly, in terms of contrast ratio, there’s a massive difference between both projectors. The Kodak Luma 150 has a dynamic contrast ratio of 1500:1, whereas the Luma 350 has a higher dynamic contrast ratio of 3500:1.
The higher contrast ratio, coupled with a brighter output, makes the Kodak Luma 350 a desirable choice for the price it’s sold at.
The lower brightness and contrast ratio of the Kodak Luma 150 requires an entirely dark room to get a decent projector.
However, thanks to its small size and lightweight design, the Kodak Luma 150 is extremely popular as a cookie projector.
Native & Supported Resolution
There’s a massive difference between the brightness and contrast ratio between the Kodak Luma 150 and 350. However, both projectors have the same native and supported resolution.
Both projectors have a native resolution of 854 x 480p, which translates to WVGA resolution.
Having said that, both projectors support up to 1080p image. Thus, you can watch HD and Full HD movies and videos on any of these projectors, but they’ll be downsized to 480p.
Display Technology & Lamp Life
Both projectors use DLP technology to project images onto a projection screen. The DLP technology is coupled with an LED light source in both projectors.
Thanks to the LED light source, both projectors have a long life of 30,000 hours. Both projectors have a rated lifespan of 20,000 hours in normal mode and 30,000 hours in Eco mode.
Connectivity Options
Both projectors have connectivity options like 1x HDMI, 1x USB, and a headphone jack. In addition, the Kodak Luma 150 also has a micro-SD card that’s useful for watching videos and images from your smartphone or camera.
Both projectors also support wireless screen mirroring. Thus, you can quickly screencast your Windows 10, iOS and Android devices screen onto the projector.
Additionally, the Kodak Luma 350 also comes with Bluetooth technology. Using it, you can connect your favorite Bluetooth speaker or headphone directly to the projector.
Smart Features
The Kodak Luma 150 includes screen mirroring options, but that’s it. On the other hand, the Kodak Luma 350 comes with Android TV 6.0 built-in.
The Android TV OS is outdated, yet it’s better to have one than nothing at all. It comes preinstalled with Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, etc. It also includes an app store to download a few other Android applications.
Battery Life
Kodak hasn’t released the battery capacity of both projectors. However, in my testing, both projectors last up to 2 hours on a full charge.
Due to the difference in size, the Kodak Luma 350 has a slightly bigger battery. However, with higher brightness and additional wireless options, it can only last up to 2 hours.
You can quickly charge the projectors with your smartphone charger or a power bank. Incidentally, you also use the projector as a power bank and charge your smartphone via the USB port.
Speakers
Both projectors come with built-in speakers. The Kodak Luma 150 has a single 1.5W speaker, whereas the Kodak Luma 350 has 3W stereo speakers in a 2x 1.5W configuration.
The built-in speakers aren’t anything to talk about; however, the 3W speakers on the Kodak Luma 350 are loud and more audible than the single 1.5W unit on the Kodak Luma 150.
Remote Control
The Kodak Luma 350 comes with a compact and handy remote control. It’s one of the few projectors that’s smaller in length than its remote control.
In comparison, the Kodak Luma 150 package doesn’t include a remote control. Rather, you’ll have to use the onboard controls.
You can also control the projector through the Kodak Luma app.
Kodak Luma 150 vs 350 Specifications
| Specifications | Kodak Luma 150 | Kodak Luma 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Brightness | 60 ANSI lumens | 150 ANSI lumens |
| Resolution | 854 x 480p | 854 x 480p |
| Supported Resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Contrast Ratio | 1500:1 | 3500:1 |
| Projection Technology | Single-chip DLP | Single-chip DLP |
| Light Source | LED | LED |
| Dimensions (LxWxH) | 3.9 x 3.9 x 0.78 inches | 4.3 x 4.3 x 1.18 inches |
| Weight | 0.5 lbs | 0.75 lbs |
| Screen Mirroring | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in Android OS | No | Yes (Android 6.0) |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Remote Control | No | Yes |
Kodak Luma 150 and 350 Alternatives
There are plenty of alternatives to the Kodak Luma 150 and Luma 350. However, I’ve zeroed in on one alternative for each projector, which offers improved features.
Kodak Luma 150 Alternative: Miroir Pro M289
- 1920 x 1080p native resolution
- 400 ANSI lumens
- 2W speakers
- 2.2 lbs weight
- Auto keystone Correction
- 5200mAH battery
Kodak Luma 350 alternative: AAXA P7+
- 1080p native resolution
- 550 LED Lumens
- Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0
- Android TV 10 built-in
- 2-hour battery life
- 4W speakers
Conclusion
I hope this Kodak Luma 150 vs 350 comparison was enough to help you reach a conclusion.
As mentioned above, the Kodak Luma 350 is a better pick over both projectors. It certainly has better and improved features, but there isn’t much difference in pricing between both projectors.
Have any questions, please don’t hesitate to leave them in the comments section below.
Thank You!
Also Read: